What a New Dialysis Centre should include in order to meet patient needsIf your patient group is not involved with the specifications being drawn up to supply a new Dialysis Centre, or has not been asked to take part in contract negotiations you are recommended by the NKF to get involved immediately. It is vital that you make early representation and be included from the very beginning. To help you in this task the NKF has produced the specification that follows it is essential reading and will assist you to ensure that all the things that patients need in a Dialysis centre are included it is too late after it is built! RENAL SERVICES SPECIFICATIONA PATIENT CENTRED SERVICERenal services of the future should be centred on the needs of people with established renal failure and designed to facilitate their journey of care. Wherever possible, haemodialysis treatment should be delivered at a time and place convenient for patients, in an environment that is clean, comfortable and conducive to treating them with respect and dignity. It is essential that all stakeholders and particularly patients are consulted at all stages in the development, expansion or any other changes affecting renal services provision. DEMOGRAPHICS AND CHOICE OF SITEBefore consideration of the siting of a renal unit or satellite the current and projected population, disease demographics, ethnic mix, transport links, case mix etc. of the area to be served should be studied to maximise service provision and ease of access for the patients. The renal unit should then be placed on a site that will best serve the needs of access for the majority of the renal patient population in its catchment area. A site should not be chosen because it is conveniently available or cheap because of location or lack of facilities e.g. parking. A main unit should be attached to an acute hospital as this allows the unit easy access to the hospital services and departments that the patients (particularly those with multiple co-morbidities) and renal medicine require. Services should particularly include radiology, cardiology, Diabetology, vascular, surgery, critical care and urology. The location of Satellites should be given particular consideration as it is now increasingly recognised that more innovation is required in taking dialysis to the patient The location of satellite dialysis units within existing or planned community service buildings should be considered, as this may enable patients, carers and the community to feel more integrated and may allow for other activities unrelated to the dialysis day to be incorporated with least effort. Smaller dialysis facilities at the Cottage Hospital and Heath centre level should also be considered as part of the regions dialysis provision strategy. In consideration of any regional dialysis strategy patient needs and choice should be considered paticularly the choice of time and place of dialysis and type of modality. All dialysis modalities should be used in the design and provision of renal strategies with programmes, workforce planning, equipment needs and facilities designed to meet these requirements. Capacity planning and resourcePatients recognise lack of capacity and resource as the main reason for lack of choice and the basis for many of their treatment problems Although Dialysis capacity has improved over the last few years it is still a serious problem. Unless we have a continuity of funding, skilled capacity management and planning of renal requirements patient needs will not be met. TransplantationTransplantation should not be overlooked in the provision of renal care as it is considered by many as the treatment of choice. A transplant unit will always be on the overall campus of an acute hospital and be intimately linked to that hospitals main renal unit and its facilities. As a result, some of the facilities needed by the transplant unit can be shared with both the main renal unit and the hospital. As with the renal unit all stakeholders including patients should be involved in the any new build, expansion or development of the unit. Project / design teams should ensure that the design of a new-build transplant unit is flexible enough to accommodate future expansion of the service. CKD and early detectionCKD and the early detection of the disease is already having an affect on patient refferal and on in the community treatment. Although it is early days the affect of this programme cannot be ignored in the renal planning process e.g. increased community treatment programmes, increase Unit clinic demands, Conservative management requirement, palliative care and end of life care requirements in the community and at the renal unit. UNIT SPECIFICATION AND DESIGNThe National Kidney Federation has been involved during the period of the NSF development in many of the aligned area ensuring that patients needs and requirements were integrated in the recommendations. The NHS estates development of specifications for new build main Renal units, Satellites and Transplant units are three areas where NKF Patient members were involved in determining the patients needs in the specification of such units. It is accepted that the standards of requirement may be difficult to achieve in some of the existing older renal unit buildings due to physical restrictions e.g no further land next to the unit for parking extentions building improvements. The standards stipulated should be regarded as minimum requirements and where old buildings are restricting the quality of services delivered to patients planning action put in place to replace the facilities. This type of strategy is already being carried out in various parts of the country and is also covered in the standards. Patient requirements are mentioned throughout the specifications and cover
This is a brief outline of what patients would see as basic requirements. The detail and standards that must be adhered are laid down in the following publications. Facilities for renal services
TransportI believe that it is important that a transport contract specification should be part of any renal unit specification so that the final cost per head for dialysis also covers the transport cost to get to the unit. The recent Cheshire and Merseyside Learning set publication in which the NKF was involved gives examples of good practice. We can supply a typical working specification if it is required. TREATMENT STANDARDSI am sure it does not need to be pointed out that there are many treatment standards already clearly defined in the following Documents They are used regularly in NHS dialysis bid assessment requirements and in ISP contracts if the standards indicated were applied they would meet the requirements of patients. Some of the main documents are
Health Care Commission AuditThis is an important area all units and perhaps particularly Independent Sector Programme Units should be inspected on a regular basis by the Health Care Commission with the results published. In the case we are looking at of a complete regions going over to ISP we should be considering perhaps a closer / more frequent level of scrutiny in the beginning. Continuity of treatmentThere must be continuity in treatment types in circumstances where contract change takes place. e.g needling methods, dialysis fluids in CAPD, Drug type etc. Patients must be consulted before changes of this type are implemented. Patient preference/ choice must be given consideration. Treatment consumablesAlthough consumables may not be part of the main contract many ISP providors will want to use their own. In cases where the change in a consumables has implications that effect patients full consultation must take place. e.g types of dialysis needles used (pain) Patient specific areasThe majority of patients are satisfied with their treatment from a medical standpoint at the last check. The main areas of patient concern come from the non medical areas. It is often difficult however to establish if the satisfaction with treatment is qualitive or gratitude based since without treatment regardless of quality patients will die. The following is a listing of prioritised patient problem areas that need to be addressed in renal services specification.
Psychosocial SupportThe impact of renal failure on patients goes beyond the clinical aspects of their condition. This type of support is rated as the number two problem by the majority of patients. This area should not be underated in its importance since it covers most of the personal, family, financial, employment and social aspects of patient lifestyles. It is an essential part of the service delivered by the Multi Disciplinary Team Holistic carePatients have clearly identified the need for a holistic approach to their care treating the patient not the disease cultural needs / considerations emotional / psychosocial drugs management - advice-information staff & patient training - staff communication - dietetics - integrated careplans - holiday finance / benfits- counselling employment environment ( unit) transport. All are part of the essential service delivered by the Multi Disciplinary Team. CommunicationDoctor patient between health care sectors (no silos) between healthcare and other agencies (social services) effective feedback high quality feedback on diagnostic tests, treatment etc Co Morbidity and integrated careplansIntegrated careplans and treatment across morbidities no silos ChoiceChoice both with a capital C as in the Governments plans and choice with a small c in the patients day to day treatment is implicit in the Renal National Service Framework. Choice means
National Service FrameworkAll units must commit to the implementation of the requirements of the Renal National Service Framework as determined at national, regional levels and the implementation of national guidence where applicable. WORKFORCE REQUIREMENTSPatients recognise the necessity for correct staffing of units with renal specific trained staff. Without a clearly defined Multi Disciplnary Team (MDT) carrying out their treatment the level and quality of that treatment will suffer. Integrated working between the renal healthcare professionals, close working relationships with primary care teams and liaison with other healthcare teams and outside agencies is essential for the delivery of high quality renal care. Staffing problems result in
Any renal unit specification must include staffing requirements, type, skills mix, clinical practice and training requirements etc. In the past on independent sector unit contracts the staffing arrangements of the Units were subject to external Regulation under Part II of the Registered Homes Act (1984)49 and the Care Standards Act 200050. In simple terms the most recent guidance and work done on renal workforce requirements is the BRS Workforce Confederation document of 2002. If nothing else it was comprehensive in its considerations. (The predictions on renal Growth are interesting 4years on.) The growth predictions in staffing requirements in this document are as shown in section 5.1.5(a). To fully understand the qualifications I suggest reading the documents conclusions. This Work Force Plan table 5.1.2 below is based on patient centred care, integrated multi-professional working and the current best practice. The recommendations for each professional group have been reviewed together to ensure consistency. Where possible the impacts of developments in practice and technological advances have been considered. Three scenarios of future dialysis and transplant patient numbers have been modeled using different assumptions with regard to the starting stock, acceptance rate, transplant supply and survival on haemodialysis. I think a patient to staff ratio qualified by a national regulation and if possible line management diagrams for those areas needing clarification would probably suffice. TABLE 5.1.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PROFESSIONAL GROUP | CURRENT WORKFORCE RATIOS | RECOMMENDED WORKFORCE RATIOS |
|---|---|---|
| Renal Physicians |
1 physician per 131 RRT patients (1 wte per 185 RRT patients) |
1 physician per 75 RRT patients (1 wte per 100 RRT patients) |
| Transplant Surgeons |
1.35 surgeons pmp (0.85 wte pmp) |
2 surgeons pmp (1.2-1.5 wte pmp) |
| Dialysis Access Surgery | 1 consultant vascular access sesion per 120 haemodialysis patients | 1 dialysis access session per 120 patients on dialysis. This equates to 1 wte surgeon per 350 cases per year |
| Donor Transplant Co-ordinators | 1 wte pmp | 1 wte pmp and 1 wte per 20 live donor transplants |
| Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Scientists | 1 wte consultant clinical scientist per 4231 RRT pts and 1 wte healthcare scientist per 260 pts on RRT | 1 wte consultant clinical scientist/medical consultant per 1200 RRT pts and 1 wte healthcare scientist per 135 RRT |
|
Renal Nurses and Health Care Assistants - Haemodialysis - Skill Mix |
1 wte per 5.1 Haemodialysis pts 2.7 nurses:1 HCA |
1 wte per 4.5 Haemodialysis pts 1.5 nurses:1 HCA |
|
- Peritoneal Dialysis - Skill Mix |
1 wte per 24 community dialysis pts 2.5 nurses:1 HCA |
1 wte per 20 community dialysis pts 5 nurses:1 HCA |
|
- Renal Wards (includes transplant wards) - Skill Mix |
1.2 wte per bed 2.5 nurses:1 HCA |
1.4 wte per bed 2.5 nurses:1 HCA |
| Dieticians | 1 wte per 260 RRT patients |
1 wte per 135 Haemodialysis patients 1 wte per 270 Peritoneal Dialysis patients 1 wte per 180 low clearance patients 1 wte per 540 transplant patients |
| Social Workers | 1 wte per 693 RRT patients | 1 wte per 140 RRT patients |
| Clinical Psychologists | 1 wte per 15233 RRT patients | 1 wte per 1000 RRT patients |
| Clinical Technologists | 1 wte per 59 haemodialyis patients |
1 wte per 50 Maintenance Haemodialysis plus 1 wte per 20 Home Haemodialysis |
| Pharmacists | 1 wte per 1120 RRT patients | 1 wte per 250 RRT patients plus 1 wte per 60 transplants per annum |
| Managers/Administrators | 1 wte per 382 dialysis pts | 1 wte per 150 dialysis pts |
| England | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 Establishment | 2001 Required | 2006 Projected | 2010 Projected | |||||
| Total | Renal wte | Total | Renal wte | Total | Renal wte | Total | Renal wte | |
| Renal Physicians | 226 | 161 | 429 | 305 | 600 | 426 | 696 | 494 |
| Renal Transplant Surgeons | 68 | 42 | 105 | 75 | 105 | 75 | 105 | 75 |
| Renal Tp Donor Co-ordinators | 67 | 50 | 68 | 50 | 112 | 83 | 112 | 83 |
| Histocompatibility Scientists | ||||||||
| - Consultant Scientist | 12 | 8 | 39 | 26 | 54 | 36 | 63 | 42 |
| - Healthcare Scientist | 180 | 111 | 370 | 231 | 517 | 323 | 598 | 374 |
| Renal Dieticians | 142 | 118 | 382 | 318 | 530 | 442 | 618 | 515 |
| Renal Social Workers | 56 | 43 | 297 | 229 | 406 | 312 | 470 | 362 |
| Renal Clinical Psychologists | 6 | 2 | 93 | 31 | 132 | 44 | 153 | 51 |
| Renal Clinical Technologists | 173 | 173 | 221 | 221 | 395 | 395 | 493 | 493 |
| Renal Pharmacists | 66 | 28 | 294 | 125 | 411 | 175 | 475 | 202 |
| Renal Admin & Managers | 55 | 43 | 134 | 105 | 211 | 165 | 260 | 203 |
| Renal Nurses | ||||||||
| - Haemodialysis | 1895 | 1541 | 1731 | 1407 | 2862 | 2327 | 3578 | 2909 |
| - Peritoneal Dialysis | 215 | 175 | 267 | 217 | 371 | 302 | 444 | 361 |
|
- Ward Based (Renal & Transplant) |
1529 | 1243 | 2507 | 2038 | 3485 | 2833 | 4034 | 3280 |
| Renal Healthcare Workers | ||||||||
| - Haemodialysis | 712 | 570 | 1173 | 938 | 1943 | 1554 | 2425 | 1940 |
| - Peritoneal Dialysis | 44 | 35 | 56 | 45 | 78 | 62 | 93 | 74 |
| - Ward Based (Renal & Transplant) | 621 | 497 | 1040 | 832 | 1446 | 1157 | 1675 | 1340 |
Any Kidney Patient Association requiring further detail or assistance in respect of any local proposal or negotiation should contact the Advocacy service at the NKF Helpline 0845 601 02 09
R W Dunn January 2007
Page created: 22 May 2007
Last updated: 17 July 2008
This website is intended for UK residents only.
If you have any comments about this site, please EMAIL the webmaster